Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36287189›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2023

Temporal Construal Effects Are Independent of Episodic Future Thought.

R Shayna Rosenbaum, J G Halilova, D Kwan, S Beneventi, C F Craver, A Gilboa, E Ciaramelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R Shayna RosenbaumDepartment of Psychology, York University.ORCID 0000-0001-5328-8675
J G HalilovaDepartment of Psychology, York University.ORCID 0000-0003-4158-5108
D KwanDepartment of Psychology, York University.
S BeneventiDipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Bologna.
C F CraverDepartment of Philosophy, Washington University in St. Louis.
A GilboaRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Canada.
E CiaramelliDipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Bologna.

Funding

CIHR 93535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human thought is prone to biases. Some biases serve as beneficial heuristics to free up limited cognitive resources or improve well-being, but their neurocognitive basis is unclear. One such bias is a tendency to construe events in the distant future in abstract, general terms and events in the near future in concrete, detailed terms. Temporal construal may rely on our capacity to orient toward and/or imagine context-rich future events. We tested 21 individuals with impaired episodic future thinking resulting from lesions to the hippocampus or ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and 57 control participants (aged 45-76 years) from Canada and Italy on measures sensitive to temporal construal. We found that temporal construal persisted in most patients, even those with impaired episodic future thinking, but was abolished in some vmPFC cases, possibly in relation to difficulties forming and maintaining future intentions. The results confirm the fractionation of future thinking and that parts of vmPFC might critically support our ability to flexibly conceive and orient ourselves toward future events.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicThinkingForecastingHippocampusHumansImaginationPrefrontal Cortexepisodic memoryfuture imagininghippocampuspatient-lesion methodtemporal orientationventromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID36287189
PMCPMC13021085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.