Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36286376›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Exploration of the X-ray Dark-Field Signal in Mineral Building Materials.

Benjamin K Blykers, Caori Organista, Matias Kagias, Federica Marone, Marco Stampanoni, Matthieu N Boone, Veerle Cnudde, Jan Aelterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin K BlykersPore-Scale Processes in Geomaterials Research Group (PProGRess), Department of Geology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-5270
Caori OrganistaGhent University Centre for X-ray Tomography (UGCT), 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Matias KagiasSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.
Federica MaroneSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3467-8763
Marco StampanoniSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7486-6681
Matthieu N BooneGhent University Centre for X-ray Tomography (UGCT), 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5478-4141
Veerle CnuddePore-Scale Processes in Geomaterials Research Group (PProGRess), Department of Geology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3269-5914
Jan AeltermanGhent University Centre for X-ray Tomography (UGCT), 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders 3179I12018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mineral building materials suffer from weathering processes such as salt efflorescence, freeze-thaw cycling, and microbial colonization. All of these processes are linked to water (liquid and vapor) in the pore space. The degree of damage following these processes is heavily influenced by pore space properties such as porosity, pore size distribution, and pore connectivity. X-ray computed micro-tomography (µCT) has proven to be a valuable tool to non-destructively investigate the pore space of stone samples in 3D. However, a trade-off between the resolution and field-of-view often impedes reliable conclusions on the material's properties. X-ray dark-field imaging (DFI) is based on the scattering of X-rays by sub-voxel-sized features, and as such, provides information on the sample complementary to that obtained using conventional µCT. In this manuscript, we apply X-ray dark-field tomography for the first time on four mineral building materials (quartzite, fired clay brick, fired clay roof tile, and carbonated mineral building material), and investigate which information the dark-field signal entails on the sub-resolution space of the sample. Dark-field tomography at multiple length scale sensitivities was performed at the TOMCAT beamline of the Swiss Light Source (Villigen, Switzerland) using a Talbot grating interferometer. The complementary information of the dark-field modality is most clear in the fired clay brick and roof tile; quartz grains that are almost indistinguishable in the conventional µCT scan are clearly visible in the dark-field owing to their low dark-field signal (homogenous sub-voxel structure), whereas the microporous bulk mass has a high dark-field signal. Large (resolved) pores on the other hand, which are clearly visible in the absorption dataset, are almost invisible in the dark-field modality because they are overprinted with dark-field signal originating from the bulk mass. The experiments also showed how the dark-field signal from a feature depends on the length scale sensitivity, which is set by moving the sample with respect to the grating interferometer.

Indexed as

dark-field tomographymineral building materialsX-rays

Identifiers

PMID36286376
PMCPMC9604867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.