Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36286374›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2022

Existing and Emerging Approaches to Risk Assessment in Patients with Ascending Thoracic Aortic Dilatation.

Nina D Anfinogenova, Valentin E Sinitsyn, Boris N Kozlov, Dmitry S Panfilov, Sergey V Popov, Alexander V Vrublevsky, Alexander Chernyavsky, Tatyana Bergen, Valery V Khovrin, Wladimir Yu Ussov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nina D AnfinogenovaCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk 634012, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1106-0730
Valentin E SinitsynUniversity Hospital, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5649-2193
Boris N KozlovCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk 634012, Russia.
Dmitry S PanfilovCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk 634012, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2201-350X
Sergey V PopovCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk 634012, Russia.
Alexander V VrublevskyCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk 634012, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-8547
Alexander ChernyavskyE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk 630055, Russia.
Tatyana BergenE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk 630055, Russia.
Valery V KhovrinPetrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Wladimir Yu UssovCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk 634012, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-5514
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUMeshalkin National Medical Research Center · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RURussian Scientific Center of Surgery · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 22-15-00313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm is a life-threatening disease, which is difficult to detect prior to the occurrence of a catastrophe. Epidemiology patterns of ascending thoracic aortic dilations/aneurysms remain understudied, whereas the risk assessment of it may be improved. The electronic databases PubMed/Medline 1966-2022, Web of Science 1975-2022, Scopus 1975-2022, and RSCI 1994-2022 were searched. The current guidelines recommend a purely aortic diameter-based assessment of the thoracic aortic aneurysm risk, but over 80% of the ascending aorta dissections occur at a size that is lower than the recommended threshold of 55 mm. Moreover, a 55 mm diameter criterion could exclude a vast majority (up to 99%) of the patients from preventive surgery. The authors review several visualization-based and alternative approaches which are proposed to better predict the risk of dissection in patients with borderline dilated thoracic aorta. The imaging-based assessments of the biomechanical aortic properties, the Young's elastic modulus, the Windkessel function, compliance, distensibility, wall shear stress, pulse wave velocity, and some other parameters have been proposed to improve the risk assessment in patients with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm. While the authors do not argue for shifting the diameter threshold to the left, they emphasize the need for more personalized solutions that integrate the imaging data with the patient's genotypes and phenotypes in this heterogeneous pathology.

Indexed as

ascending thoracic aortic aneurysmbiomechanicsimagingopen aortic repairpre-emptive surgeryrisk predictiontransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID36286374
PMCPMC9605541
OpenAlexW4306385952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.