ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
Effect of Anisotropic Electrical Conductivity Induced by Fiber Orientation on Ablation Characteristics of Pulsed Field Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: A Computational Study.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating traditional statistics and explainable machine learning for risk stratification of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulsed field ablation: a hypothesis-generating single-center study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Ablation catheter-induced mechanical deformation in myocardium: computer modeling and ex vivo experiments.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Investigate the relationship between pulsed field ablation parameters and ablation outcomes.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024Article
- A New Hope for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Application of Pulsed-Field Ablation Technology.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Limitations.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Determinants of acute irreversible electroporation lesion characteristics after pulsed field ablation: the role of voltage, contact, and adipose interference.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- New Perspectives on Risk Stratification and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis of Recent Contributions on theJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising new ablation modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the effect of fiber orientation on the ablation characteristics of PFA in AF treatment is still unclear, which is likely an essential factor in influencing the ablation characteristics. This study constructed an anatomy-based left atrium (LA) model incorporating fiber orientation and selected various electrical conductivity and ablation targets to investigate the effect of anisotropic electrical conductivity (AC), compared with isotropic electrical conductivity (IC), on the ablation characteristics of PFA in AF treatment. The results show that the percentage differences in the size of the surface ablation area between AC and IC are greater than 73.71%; the maximum difference in the size of the ablation isosurface between AC and IC at different locations in the atrial wall is 3.65 mm (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.