Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36285518›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2024

Distal radial artery approach is safe and effective for cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular treatment: A single-center experience with ultrasonographic measurement.

Motoyuki Umekawa, Satoshi Koizumi, Kenta Ohara, Daiichiro Ishigami, Satoru Miyawaki, Nobuhito Saito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Feasibility of the distal transradial approach with an 8-Fr balloon guide catheter for neurointerventional procedures.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Forearm access for carotid artery stenting using the dual protection of flow reversal and distal filter: Trans-forearm dual protection technique.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Motoyuki UmekawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-9861
Satoshi KoizumiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Kenta OharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Daiichiro IshigamiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4437-5421
Satoru MiyawakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Nobuhito SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
University of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transradial artery approach to cerebral angiography can reduce both patient stress following examination and the risk of major complications due to hematoma. Recently, the distal radial artery approach (DRA) has garnered attention in cardiology as a minimally invasive method. DRA is also considered applicable to neurosurgery, although concerns about procedural difficulty and complications persist. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the DRA in cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular treatment.

methodsWe retrospectively selected 30 consecutive patients for whom the DRA was attempted for cerebral angiography at our hospital. The patients' age, sex, height, weight, and medical history information was collected and correlated with successful puncture and complications. The diameter of the distal radial artery (RA) was measured using ultrasonography.

resultsThe median patient age was 67 years (range, 32-87 years) and 21 (70%) were men. The median diameter of the distal RA was 2.3 mm (range, 1.7-3.2 mm). Distal RA puncture was successful in 23 patients (77%) and no complications were noted; however there was no significant correlation between successful puncture and any of the patient factors. Carotid artery stenting and preoperative tumor embolization were performed via DRA in six and three cases, respectively. Although puncture site hematoma occurred in only one case, all treatments were successful, and no major complications were observed.

conclusionDRA can be safely used for cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular treatment.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyEndovascular ProceduresRadial ArteryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographycerebral angiographydistal radial arteryless invasive techniqueneuroendovascular treatmentradial artery

Identifiers

PMID36285518
PMCPMC11095355
OpenAlexW4307341584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.