Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36285350›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Recovery in Mind: A Recovery College's journey through the Covid-19 pandemic.

Heather Yoeli, Angela Ryan, Cath Hensby, Fiona Habermehl, Sarah Burton, Jacqueline Sin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A co-created multimethod evaluation of recovery education in Ireland.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Recovery in Mind: A Recovery College's journey through the Covid-19 pandemic.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather YoeliSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5505-9366
Angela RyanRecovery in Mind, Newbury, UK.
Cath HensbyRecovery in Mind, Newbury, UK.
Fiona HabermehlRecovery in Mind, Newbury, UK.
Sarah BurtonRecovery in Mind, Newbury, UK.
Jacqueline SinSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0590-7165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Covid-19 restrictions of 2020-2021 are known to have undermined the UK population's mental health. Working alongside staff, peer trainers and students at Recovery in Mind (RiM), a Recovery College (RC) in West Berkshire, England, this mixed-methods study is amongst the first to investigate how an RC has responded to the pandemic.

methodsWorking in co-production with RiM staff and peer-trainers, this study employed a mixed-methods design, gathering Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) well-being outcome measures by questionnaire and student experience, learning and co-production by interviews.

findingsThis research found that RiM continued to produce demonstrable improvements in student mental health. Students welcomed the way that RiM adapted to offering online and socially distanced provisions. Students valued the skills that RiM taught and the way that RiM courses reinforced prior learning; above this, however, they valued the mutual support and sense of community that participation provided.

conclusionThis study underlines the value of RCs maintaining 'hidden curriculums' of peer support and community involvement. This research emphasizes co-production as not only a tool for empowerment or service improvement but as a valuable skill for personal mental health recovery. Even when operating under the most unforeseen or challenging of conditions, RCs should always endeavour to prioritize and maintain co-production. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: In accordance with the RC ethos, this was an entirely co-produced study, with academic researchers and RiM staff and peer trainers working democratically in partnership with one another to design and manage the study and to write up and disseminate findings. To ensure the independence and rigour of findings, data analysis was undertaken by external academic researchers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesHumansMental HealthPandemicsPeer Groupco-productionCovid-19peer trainersRecovery Collegewell-being

Identifiers

PMID36285350
PMCPMC9700130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.