ReviewGMS hygiene and infection control2022
Guidelines on the use of disinfectants: comparison between Malaysia and other countries.
Review in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential spillover effect of eco-directed pharmaceutical disposal on pro-environmental disinfectant use among Chinese residents.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence, pandemic, preventions and policies to overcome antimicrobial resistance.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Sanitation and cleanliness are essential factors in reducing the spread of pathogens and preventing healthcare-associated infections. Disinfectants are associated with better hygiene outcomes to reduce pathogen transmission risk and minimize risks to healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients. Methods: A literature search was undertaken using the electronic databases Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria for this study are observational and original research studies dating from the five-year period 2017-2021. Other inclusion criteria are full text, English language, qualitative or quantitative studies relevant to the research question. The exclusion criteria are animal studies, systematic reviews, conference proceedings, abstracts, projection modelling studies, in-vivo or in-vitro studies, and books. Results: Five study nations included the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), China, India and South Korea, together with Malaysia. These nations have existing policies, regulations and guidelines regarding the use of disinfectants. HCWs should be aware of the national laws and guidelines that govern the purchase, distribution and use of disinfectants. They should also understand the different roles of the agencies involved, so the context for the guidance provided is clear. Coordination and collaboration across various stakeholders are required for creating solid policies. Conclusion: Product research and innovation are indispensable, as appropriate personal protective equipment and safety measures for HCWs and patients have top priority in every nation. Hence, clear guidelines for handling disinfectants, in addition to health education about scientific-evidence-based disinfectants, are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.