Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36285203›Full record

ReviewEpilepsy currents

Seizing Control of Neuronal Activity: Chemogenetic Applications in Epilepsy.

Patrick A Forcelli

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsy currents. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preoperative MEG reveals differential brain network characteristics in drug-resistant epilepsy patients based on vagus nerve stimulation response.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. New epilepsy therapies in development.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick A ForcelliDepartment of Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-060X
Georgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental commonality across pharmacotherapies for the epilepsies is the modulation of neuronal excitability. This poses a clear challenge-patterned neuronal excitation is essential to normal function, thus disrupting this activity leads to side effects. Moreover, the efficacy of current pharmacotherapy remains incomplete despite decades of drug development. Approaches that allow for the selective targeting of critical populations of cells and particular pathways in the brain have the potential to both avoid side effects and improve efficacy. Chemogenetic methods, which combine the selective expression of designer receptors with designer drugs, have rapidly grown in use in the neurosciences, including in epilepsy. This review will briefly highlight the history of chemogenetics, their applications to date in epilepsy, and the potential (and potential hurdles to overcome) for future translation.

Indexed as

chemogeneticsDREADDhM4DPSAMRASSL

Identifiers

PMID36285203
PMCPMC9549225
OpenAlexW4296390228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.