Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36285145›Full record

ReviewCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2021

Challenges and Possibilities of Cell-Based Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts.

Junichi Saito, Makoto Kaneko, Yoshihiro Ishikawa, Utako Yokoyama

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in the Model Structure of In Vitro Vascularized Organ-on-a-Chip.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Robotic Intracellular Electrochemical Sensing for Adherent Cells.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junichi SaitoDepartment of Physiology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto KanekoFaculty of Science and Technology, Meijo University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshihiro IshikawaCardiovascular Research Institute, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Utako YokoyamaDepartment of Physiology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1803-0155
Tokyo Medical University · JPCardiovascular Institute Hospital · JPMeijo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is urgent demand for biologically compatible vascular grafts for both adult and pediatric patients. The utility of conventional nonbiodegradable materials is limited because of their thrombogenicity and inability to grow, while autologous vascular grafts involve considerable disadvantages, including the invasive procedures required to obtain these healthy vessels from patients and insufficient availability in patients with systemic atherosclerosis. All of these issues could be overcome by tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs). A large body of evidence has recently emerged in support of TEVG technologies, introducing diverse cell sources (e.g., somatic cells and stem cells) and novel fabrication methods (e.g., scaffold-guided and self-assembled approaches). Before TEVG can be applied in a clinical setting, however, several aspects of the technology must be improved, such as the feasibility of obtaining cells, their biocompatibility and mechanical properties, and the time needed for fabrication, while the safety of supplemented materials, the patency and nonthrombogenicity of TEVGs, their growth potential, and the long-term influence of implanted TEVGs in the body must be assessed. Although recent advances in TEVG fabrication have yielded promising results, more research is needed to achieve the most feasible methods for generating optimal TEVGs. This article reviews multiple aspects of TEVG fabrication, including mechanical requirements, extracellular matrix components, cell sources, and tissue engineering approaches. The potential of periodic hydrostatic pressurization in the production of scaffold-free TEVGs with optimal elasticity and stiffness is also discussed. In the future, the integration of multiple technologies is expected to enable improved TEVG performance.

Identifiers

PMID36285145
PMCPMC9494692
OpenAlexW3130113120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.