ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2022
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of pressure injury in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Tools for Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- A nomogram to predict the risk of surgery-related pressure ulcers in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the risk of pressure injury (PI) in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery and validate its effectiveness among these patients. Methods: This study retrospectively included 11,247 adult patients, who underwent abdominal surgery and postoperative supervision in ICU, in a tertiary care hospital in western China between January 2017 and December 2020. All datasets were extracted from the patient's medical records and randomly divided into the training cohort (8,997) and the validation cohort (2,250) by 8:2. The univariable logistic regression was used to select potentially relevant features. Then, multivariable logistic regression was also conducted and utilized to establish the nomogram. The nomogram was compared with the Braden scale for predicting PI in the validation cohort through the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: 873 (7.8%) patients suffered PIs. Logistic regression analysis showed that time of operation, weight, type of operation, albumin, and Braden scale score were independent risk factors for PI. A nomogram integrating five selected characteristics was constructed. The AUC of the ROC curve for the nomogram was 0.831, with a specificity of 85.2% and sensitivity of 63.7%. The AUC of the ROC curve for the Braden scale was 0.567, with a specificity of only 33.0%. The Conclusion: Compared with the Braden scale, the nomogram showed a better predictive performance. This nomogram is informative and has the potential to better guide caregivers for risk stratification and prevention of PI, although it requires further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.