Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36285017›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2022

Exploratory study of the underutilization of CTSA module services.

Julie T Elworth, Melissa Vaught, Jillian Harvey, Rechelle Paranal, Adrienne Zell, Charbel El Bcheraoui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie T ElworthInstitute of Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6978-8428
Melissa VaughtInstitute of Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jillian HarveySouth Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6814-8226
Rechelle ParanalSouth Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Adrienne ZellOregon Clinical & Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Charbel El BcheraouiInstitute of Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
CTSA Coordinating Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC)U24TR002260 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OSSIP, DEBORAH J, ZAND, MARTIN S · 2017 to 2021
$19.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002260NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program aims to enhance the quality, efficiency, and impact of translation from discovery to interventions that improve human health. CTSA program hubs at medical research institutions across the United States develop and test innovative tools, methods, and processes, offering core resources and training for the clinical and translational research (CTR) workforce. Hubs have developed services across different domains, such as informatics and pilot studies, to provide Methods: Through interviews with CTSA service users and a survey of CTSA service managers, this exploratory study aims to identify barriers to using services from multiple modules and solutions to overcome those barriers. Results: Barriers include challenges in finding information about services, unclear or unknown user needs, and users' lack of funding to engage in services. More issues were identified for the largest CTSA. Conclusions: Although this study represents a small subset of CTSA hubs, we anticipate that our findings and proposed solutions will be relevant to the broader CTSA community. This study provides foundational information can use in their own efforts to increase service utilization and methods that can be used for more comprehensive studies that focus on explaining the relationship between CTSA features and rates of single versus cross-module service use.

Indexed as

CTSAprogram evaluationresearch servicesservice utilizationsilo effect

Identifiers

PMID36285017
PMCPMC9549576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.