ArticleDisease markers2022
Exploring the Risk Factors of Conjunctival Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Establishing a Prognostic Model: Retrospective Study.
Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectral Transmittance of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses: Variability in Ultraviolet Blocking.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- IFNα2b/5-FU inhibits proliferation and cell cycle of squamous carcinoma cell line Cal27.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Exploring the risk factors of conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and establishing a prognostic model. Methods: Information on patients with CSCC was extracted from the SEER database, conducting a retrospective study. 650 patients with CSCC were finally included in the model. Descriptive analysis was performed by Chi-square test and Results: The all-cause mortality rate of CSCC was 38.3%, and the risk factors were age (HR = 1.077), sex (HR = 0.691), grade (HR = 7.857), laterality (HR = 1.403), N (HR = 7.195), M (HR = 0.217), and surgery (HR = 1.618), all Conclusions: Compared with the clinical guidance of AJCC (TNM) for patients with CSCC, the established model exhibits good performance and can provide guidance for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.