Impact of restrictive versus liberal transfusion and clinical outcomes in critically ill children: A retrospective observational study.

Background and Aims: Critically ill children with anemia often requires blood transfusion, which can cause several complications. It is important to decide when to start the red blood cell (RBC) transfusion; however, the guidelines is still lacking. The aim of this study was to compare restrictive and liberal transfusion strategy. Methods: This is an observational retrospective study of critically-ill children who receive RBC transfusion. Subjects categorized into two groups by initial hemoglobin (Hb), that is, restrictive (Hb ≤ 7 g/dl) and liberal (Hb ≤ 9.5 g/dl) strategy. In each group, subjects categorized based on: (1) Hb increment: high (increased ≥2.5 g/dl) and low (increase <2.5 g/dl) and (2) final Hb level: low (<7.0 mg/dl), moderate (7.0-10.0 mg/dl), and high (>10.0 mg/dl). Patient with hematologic or congenital disorder, severe malnutrition, chronic infection-related anemia, and transfusion in Hb level ≥9.5 g/dl were exclude. Each patients were evaluated for the clinical outcome, which is: intensive care length of stay (IC-LOS), length of mechanical ventilation (LoMV), and mortality rate. Results: Clinical outcome and mortality rates of both transfusion strategies are similar. The mortality rates were lower in higher Hb increment and final Hb level ( Conclusion: We conclude the restrictive and liberal transfusion strategy have a similar effect to IC-LOS, LoMV, and mortality rate. High Hb increment (≥2.5 g/dl) and moderate-high final Hb (≥7.0 g/dl) after transfusion reduce the mortality rate.