Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284929›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2022

SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific IFN-γ T-cell Response After COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, on Dialysis, or Living With a Kidney Transplant.

Céline Imhof, A Lianne Messchendorp, Marieke van der Heiden, Carla C Baan, Renate G van der Molen, Ester B M Remmerswaal, Rory D de Vries, Dimitri A Diavatopoulos, Annemarie Boerma, Femke J Bakker and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Céline ImhofDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A Lianne MesschendorpDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marieke van der HeidenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Carla C BaanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Renate G van der MolenRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ester B M RemmerswaalDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rory D de VriesDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dimitri A DiavatopoulosRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annemarie BoermaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Femke J BakkerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emily OosterhoutDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frederike J BemelmanRenal Transplant Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luuk B HilbrandsDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marlies E J ReindersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron T GansevoortDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Stephan SandersDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Debbie van BaarleDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLErasmus MC · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is associated with a lower humoral response in vulnerable kidney patients. Here, we investigated the T-cell response following COVID-19 vaccination in kidney patients compared with controls. Methods: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage G4/5 [estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2], on dialysis, or living with a kidney transplant and controls received 2 doses of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated at baseline and 28 d after the second vaccination. In 398 participants (50% of entire cohort; controls n = 95, CKD G4/5 n = 81, dialysis n = 78, kidney transplant recipients [KTRs] n = 144)' SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were measured using an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot assay. Results: A significantly lower SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response was observed after vaccination of patients on dialysis (54.5%) and KTRs (42.6%) in contrast to CDK G4/5 (70%) compared with controls (76%). The use of calcineurin inhibitors was associated with a low T-cell response in KTRs. In a subset of 20 KTRs, we observed waning of the cellular response 6 mo after the second vaccination, which was boosted to some extent after a third vaccination, although T-cell levels remained low. Conclusion: Our data suggest that vaccination is less effective in these patient groups, with humoral nonresponders also failing to mount an adequate cellular response, even after the third vaccination. Given the important role of T cells in protection against disease and cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 variants, alternative vaccination strategies are urgently needed in these high-risk patient groups.

Identifiers

PMID36284929
PMCPMC9584182
OpenAlexW4307501596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.