Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284902›Full record

ArticleSoft computing2023

An improved butterfly optimization algorithm for training the feed-forward artificial neural networks.

Büşra Irmak, Murat Karakoyun, Şaban Gülcü

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MLP Enhanced COScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial Neural Networks for the Prediction of Monkeypox Outbreak.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Büşra IrmakDepartment of Computer Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-7954
Murat KarakoyunDepartment of Computer Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0677-9313
Şaban GülcüDepartment of Computer Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7714-8861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial neural network (ANN) which is an information processing technique developed by modeling the nervous system of the human brain is one of the most powerful learning methods today. One of the factors that make ANN successful is its training algorithm. In this paper, an improved butterfly optimization algorithm (IBOA) based on the butterfly optimization algorithm was proposed for training the feed-forward artificial neural networks. The IBOA algorithm has the chaotic property which helps optimization algorithms to explore the search space more dynamically and globally. In the experiments, ten chaotic maps were used. The success of the IBOA algorithm was tested on 13 benchmark functions which are well known to those working on global optimization and are frequently used for testing and analysis of optimization algorithms. The Tent-mapped IBOA algorithm outperformed the other algorithms in most of the benchmark functions. Moreover, the success of the IBOA-MLP algorithm also has been tested on five classification datasets (xor, balloon, iris, breast cancer, and heart) and the IBOA-MLP algorithm was compared with four algorithms in the literature. According to the statistical performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, precision,

Indexed as

Artificial neural networksButterfly optimization algorithmChaosMultilayer perceptronTraining artificial neural networks

Identifiers

PMID36284902
PMCPMC9584244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.