ReviewCureus2022
Newly Discovered Cutting-Edge Triple Combination Cystic Fibrosis Therapy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ivacaftor-tezacaftor-elexacaftor, tezacaftor-ivacaftor and lumacaftor-ivacaftor for treating cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Protocol for generating iPSC-derived intestinal organoids through dissection to model cystic fibrosis therapies.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Cystic fibrosis-related kidney disease-emerging morbidity and disease modifier.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Article
- Endocrine pathology in young rabbits with cystic fibrosis.eGastroenterology · 2024Article
- One-Year Effect of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Therapy on HbA1c Levels and Insulin Requirement in Patients with Insulin-Dependent Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Differential distribution of ivacaftor and its metabolites in plasma and human airway epithelia.Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024Article
- COPII cage assembly factor Sec13 integrates information flow regulating endomembrane function in response to human variation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of highly effective modulator therapy on the dynamics of the respiratory mucosal environment and inflammatory response in cystic fibrosis.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Article
- Editorial: Microbial interactions and survival mechanisms in chronic respiratory infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Cystic fibrosis: desensitization in delayed hypersensitivity reactions to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductor regulator (CFTR) gene modulating triple therapy combining elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (Trikafta) has been recently discovered. Its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 has expanded the target therapy group to individuals aged twelve and up with at least one Phe508del (phenylalanine 508 deletion) mutation in the CFTR gene. This systematic review aims to assess this combination therapy's safety and efficacy. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, an in-depth search was performed. The search was done by utilizing databases such as PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholar, and Science Direct for articles related to this topic. Studies published in the last five years in the English language were chosen preliminarily. Further eligibility criteria and quality assessment tools were employed to assess the risk of bias and finalize ten articles to be used in this review. The chosen articles constituted four randomized control trials (RCTs), four systematic reviews, and two narrative reviews. The last date for data collection was April 24, 2022. Based on the findings of this review, we concluded that by combining three CFTR modulators, this therapy had outperformed all the currently available medications in terms of improving pulmonary function, reducing exacerbations, and enhancing the quality of life of CF patients. In clinical trials, headache and rash were the most common side effects, and laboratory testing to assess liver function is suggested. Long-term safety and effectiveness must be confirmed by the continued review of real-life patient data. Studies done on triple therapy thus far have been promising. Unfortunately, a small proportion of the CF population remains ineligible for any form of CFTR modulator therapy owing to their type of genetic mutation, and this provides ground for further research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.