Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284720›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Intraoperative Interpectoral and Subserratus Nerve Blocks in Breast Augmentation Surgery.

Mark A Lee, Conor B McCartney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A LeeDepartment of Plastic Surgery, St John of God Hospital Subiaco, Subiaco, Perth, Australia.
Conor B McCartneyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, St John of God Hospital Subiaco, Subiaco, Perth, Australia.
Creative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An essential component in ambulatory breast augmentation surgery is good analgesia. The demographic undergoing this operation is usually fit, low risk with few comorbidities. These patients do not require long-term hospitalization and do not want to spend excessive time in the hospital for financial reasons. Opiate analgesia can have significant side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and sedation. Reducing volumes of postoperative opiates allows faster ambulation and discharge from day surgery. We have developed two targeted nerve blocks that the operating surgeon can apply in minutes under direct vision, not requiring imaging. Anecdotally, we found that these targeted nerve blocks reduced opiate requirements and allowed accelerated discharge and faster return to normal activities. We conducted a prospective randomized, double-blind trial to test this theory. Methods: Twenty patients were randomized into saline (n = 10) or ropivacaine adrenaline solution (n = 10). The operating surgeons and anesthetists were blinded to the solution. All patients were closely followed up, and morphine equivalents were accurately recorded. Follow-up pain scores were recorded using the Overall Benefit of Analgesia pain questionnaire. Results: The ropivacaine nerve blocks significantly reduced opiate requirements postoperatively ( Conclusion: Intraoperative targeted nerve blocks significantly reduce postoperative opiate requirements in breast augmentation surgery resulting in faster recovery and higher patient satisfaction.

Identifiers

PMID36284720
PMCPMC9584193
OpenAlexW4307502484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.