ArticleMolecular vision2022
Untargeted metabolomic analysis of aqueous humor in diabetic macular edema.
Article in Molecular vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipid profile in the aqueous humor of diabetic macular edema patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of metabolites associated with ADIPOQ genotypes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Trends and hot spots in research related to aqueous humor from 2014 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Critical Factors in Sample Collection and Preparation for Clinical Metabolomics of Underexplored Biological Specimens.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Simultaneous Comparison of Aqueous Humor and Serum Metabolic Profiles of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery-A Targeted and Quantitative Metabolomics Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The mechanism of diabetic macular edema (DME) was explored by comparing the intraocular metabolite profiles of the aqueous humor of patients with DME to those of diabetic patients without DME using untargeted metabolomic analysis. Methods: Aqueous samples from 18 type 2 diabetic patients with DME and 18 type 2 diabetic patients without DME used as controls were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS). The two groups of patients were age and gender matched and had no systemic diseases other than diabetes mellitus (DM). The metabolites were analyzed using orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis. Results: The metabolite profiles in DME patients differed from those in DM controls. This indicates the following metabolic derangements in DME: (a) a higher amount of oxidized fatty acids but a lower amount of endogenous antioxidants (oxidative stress); (b) higher levels of β-glucose and homocysteine but a lower level of sorbitol (hyperglycemia); (c) a higher amount of prostaglandin metabolites (inflammation); (d) higher amounts of acylcarnitines, odd-numbered fatty acids, and 7,8-diaminononanoate (respiration deterioration); (e) a higher amount of neurotransmitter metabolites and homovanillic acid (neuronal damage); (f) a lower amount of extracellular matrix (ECM) constituents (ECM deterioration); and (g) a higher amount of di-amino peptides (microvascular damage). Conclusions: The change in the metabolic profiles in the aqueous humor of DME patients compared to DM controls without DME indicates that DME patients may have less capability to resist various stresses or damaging pathological conditions, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial insufficiency, inflammation, and ECM deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36284671PMC9514551W4307775315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.