Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284608›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR2022

The effect of pecha-kucha training on fear and belief in myths of COVID-19 in elderly women.

Çiğdem Gün Kakaşçı, Nazife Bakır, Cuma Demir

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Pecha Kucha in medical education: a narrative literature review.Korean journal of medical education · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Çiğdem Gün KakaşçıSuleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Turkey.
Nazife BakırDepartment of Nursing, Bucak School of Health, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.
Cuma DemirHealth Sciences Institute, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi · TRKafkas University · TRSüleyman Demirel University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate and accurate information reduces pandemic fear in elderly women with chronic disease, one of the risk groups for COVID-19. We aim to determine the effect of pecha kucha pandemic training on the fear and belief in myths of COVID-19 in elderly women. This prospective, randomized controlled experimental study with pre- and post-tests employed a total of 64 elderly women, including 32 for each of experimental and control groups. The data were collected using an introductory information form, the Questionnaire for Beliefs in COVID-19 Myths, and the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. Women in the experimental group were informed about COVID-19, using a pecha kucha presentation via smart phone. Those in the control group were given the same information using classical lecture method. The data were collected before, just after, and 3 months after the training and analyzed using Pearson's chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. Elderly women in the experimental group had significantly lower fear and belief in myths of COVID-19 both just after and 3 months after the training (p < 0.05, p < 0.05). A pandemic training by pecha-kucha presentation, which is a short, clear, understandable and memorable method of teaching, can reduce both fear and belief in myths of COVID-19 in elderly women.

Indexed as

COVID-19FearMythsPecha-kucha

Identifiers

PMID36284608
PMCPMC9584852
OpenAlexW4306978140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.