Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284602›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2023

How much do time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) moments improve estimation of brain activity over traditional fNIRS?

Antonio Ortega-Martinez, De'Ja Rogers, Jessica Anderson, Parya Farzam, Yuanyuan Gao, Bernhard Zimmermann, Meryem A Yücel, David A Boas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio Ortega-MartinezBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-4341
De'Ja RogersBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5112-4324
Jessica AndersonBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-8717
Parya FarzamBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Yuanyuan GaoBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2904-5021
Bernhard ZimmermannBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Meryem A YücelBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-2847
David A BoasBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-7711

Funding

The Neuroscience of Everyday World- A novel wearable system for continuous measurement of brain functionU01EB029856 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BOAS, DAVID A, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2020 to 2024
$6.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Advances in electronics have allowed the recent development of compact, high channel count time domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy (TD-fNIRS) systems. Temporal moment analysis has been proposed for increased brain sensitivity due to the depth selectivity of higher order temporal moments. We propose a general linear model (GLM) incorporating TD moment data and auxiliary physiological measurements, such as short separation channels, to improve the recovery of the HRF. Aims: We compare the performance of previously reported multi-distance TD moment techniques to commonly used techniques for continuous wave (CW) fNIRS hemodynamic response function (HRF) recovery, namely block averaging and CW GLM. Additionally, we compare the multi-distance TD moment technique to TD moment GLM. Approach: We augmented resting TD-fNIRS moment data (six subjects) with known synthetic HRFs. We then employed block averaging and GLM techniques with "short-separation regression" designed both for CW and TD to recover the HRFs. We calculated the root mean square error (RMSE) and the correlation of the recovered HRF to the ground truth. We compared the performance of equivalent CW and TD techniques with paired t-tests. Results: We found that, on average, TD moment HRF recovery improves correlations by 98% and 48% for HbO and HbR respectively, over CW GLM. The improvement on the correlation for TD GLM over TD moment is 12% (HbO) and 27% (HbR). RMSE decreases 56% and 52% (HbO and HbR) for TD moment compared to CW GLM. We found no statistically significant improvement in the RMSE for TD GLM compared to TD moment. Conclusions: Properly covariance-scaled TD moment techniques outperform their CW equivalents in both RMSE and correlation in the recovery of the synthetic HRFs. Furthermore, our proposed TD GLM based on moments outperforms regular TD moment analysis, while allowing the incorporation of auxiliary measurements of the confounding physiological signals from the scalp.

Indexed as

correlationfunctional near-infrared spectroscopygeneral linear modelmomentsroot-mean-square errortime-domain

Identifiers

PMID36284602
PMCPMC9587749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.