Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284468›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Evaluation of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Region in 15 Patients by Cone Beam Computed Tomography at a Single Center in South India.

Arathi Murugesan, S P Saravana Dinesh, Srirengalakshmi Muthuswamy Pandian, Lichi Ashwin Solanki, Abdulrahman Alshehri, Wael Awadh, Khalid J Alzahrani, Khalaf F Alsharif, Mrim M Alnfiai, Reji Mathew and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A CBCT Assessment of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Arathi MurugesanDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
S P Saravana DineshDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Srirengalakshmi Muthuswamy PandianDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Lichi Ashwin SolankiDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Abdulrahman AlshehriDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Wael AwadhDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid J AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-0106
Khalaf F AlsharifDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Mrim M AlnfiaiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Reji MathewDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dental Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Tarek El-BialyDepartment of Orthodontics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, KatzGroup Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4435-5172
Hosam Ali BaeshenDepartment of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Shilpa BhandiCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT, USA.
A Thirumal RajDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Shankargouda PatilCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT, USA.
Saveetha University · INTaif University · SAJazan University · SARoseman University of Health Sciences · USKing Abdulaziz University · SAMidwestern University · USSri Venkateswara Medical College and Ruia Hospital · INUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to evaluate orthodontic mini-implant placement in the maxillary anterior alveolar region by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in 15 patients at a single center in South India. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 15 CBCT scans of orthodontic patients after completion of leveling and aligning stage were included. The thickness of labial alveolar bone, labio-palatal bone, and inter-radicular distance between the maxillary central incisors (U1-U1), maxillary central and lateral incisor (U1-U2), and maxillary lateral incisor and canine (U2-U3) at vertical levels 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm above the interdental cementoenamel junction were measured. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc tests were done to assess the differences among the groups. An independent t test was done to analyze differences by sex. RESULTS The thickness of cortical bone in the labial region was higher in the U2-U3 site than in the U1-U1 site, at a height of 4 mm. Also, there was a significant difference between 4 mm and 8 mm heights in the U2-U3 region. No significant difference was noted in bone dimensions among men and women and in the labio-palatal bone thickness among the different sites. The inter-radicular distance was the highest between the U2-U3 site, while it was the lowest in the U1-U2 site. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this center showed that when CBCT was used to evaluate orthodontic mini-implant placement in the maxillary anterior alveolar region, the U2-U3 and U1-U1 locations at heights between 6 mm to 8 mm apical to the interdental cementoenamel junction were optimal for placement of the mini-implants.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresAlveolar ProcessAnimalsCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleMaxillaDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID36284468
PMCPMC9620727
OpenAlexW4304005584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.