Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284402›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2023

Deep Learning of Coronary Calcium Scores From PET/CT Attenuation Maps Accurately Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events.

Konrad Pieszko, Aakash Shanbhag, Aditya Killekar, Robert J H Miller, Mark Lemley, Yuka Otaki, Ananya Singh, Jacek Kwiecinski, Heidi Gransar, Serge D Van Kriekinge and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06379295 (Coronary Artery Calcification Assessed on PET Scanner), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06379295 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Coronary Artery Calcification Assessed on PET Scanner (PET : Positron Emission Tomography)

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansRan2024 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery CalcificationArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incremental diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-derived coronary artery calcium inJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Revisiting Perfusion in the Forgotten Right Ventricle: Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Quantification on PET/CT.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ejection fraction quantification from ungated chest CT by AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The REgistry of Flow and Perfusion Imaging for Artificial Intelligence with positron emission tomography (REFINE PET):Rationale and design.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Konrad PieszkoDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Interventional Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Aakash ShanbhagDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Aditya KillekarDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Robert J H MillerDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mark LemleyDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Yuka OtakiDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ananya SinghDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jacek KwiecinskiDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Heidi GransarDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Serge D Van KriekingeDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Paul B KavanaghDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Edward J MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Timothy BatemanCardiovascular Imaging Technologies, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Joanna X LiangDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Daniel S BermanDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Damini DeyDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: piotr.slomka@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHeart Imaging Technologies (United States) · USYale University · US

Funding

Quantitative Prediction of Disease and Outcomes from Next Generation SPECT and CTR01HL089765 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2007 to 2021
$6.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of coronary artery calcium (CAC) by computed tomographic (CT) imaging provides an accurate measure of atherosclerotic burden. CAC is also visible in computed tomographic attenuation correction (CTAC) scans, always acquired with cardiac positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop a deep-learning (DL) model capable of fully automated CAC definition from PET CTAC scans.

methodsThe novel DL model, originally developed for video applications, was adapted to rapidly quantify CAC. The model was trained using 9,543 expert-annotated CT scans and was tested in 4,331 patients from an external cohort undergoing PET/CT imaging with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (follow-up 4.3 years), including same-day paired electrocardiographically gated CAC scans available in 2,737 patients. MACE risk stratification in 4 CAC score categories (0, 1-100, 101-400, and >400) was analyzed and CAC scores derived from electrocardiographically gated CT scans (standard scores) by expert observers were compared with automatic DL scores from CTAC scans.

resultsAutomatic DL scoring required <6 seconds per scan. DL CTAC scores provided stepwise increase in the risk for MACE across the CAC score categories (HR up to 3.2; P < 0.001). Net reclassification improvement of standard CAC scores over DL CTAC scores was nonsignificant (-0.02; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.07). The negative predictive values for MACE of zero CAC with standard (85%) and DL CTAC (83%) CAC scores were similar (P = 0.19).

conclusionsDL CTAC scores predict cardiovascular risk similarly to standard CAC scores quantified manually by experienced operators from dedicated electrocardiographically gated CAC scans and can be obtained almost instantly, with no changes to PET/CT scanning protocol.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDeep LearningCalciumHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsCalciumattenuation correctioncomputed tomographycoronary artery diseasecoronary calcium scorepositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID36284402
PMCPMC13016421
OpenAlexW4295774775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.