Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284346›Full record

SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meng Dong, Ruifeng Liu, Qiuning Zhang, Hongtao Luo, Dandan Wang, Yuhang Wang, Junru Chen, Yuhong Ou, Xiaohu Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal of particle therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Osteosarcoma: current insights and advances.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Current topics and management of head and neck sarcomas.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meng DongInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ruifeng Liu *Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qiuning ZhangInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. zhangqn@impcas.ac.cn.
Hongtao LuoInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Dandan WangInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuhang WangInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Junru ChenInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuhong OuInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohu WangInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. xhwang@impcas.ac.cn.

Funding

Key R&D Program of Science and Technology Department of Gansu Province No. 20YF8FA116Science and Technology Plan Project of Chengguan District of Lanzhou No.2020-2-2-5Talent innovation and venture project of Lanzhou city No. 2017-RC-23The authorized project of Lanzhou KejinTaiji Corporation, Ltd No. BMP-B-02-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas.

methodsWe searched for articles using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases from their inception to January 12, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0.

resultsWe searched for 4378 candidate articles, of which 12 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 897 BSs patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy in the studies, 526 patients had chordoma, 255 patients had chondrosarcoma, 112 patients had osteosarcoma, and 4 patients had other sarcomas. The local control rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.961-1.009, I

conclusionAs an advanced radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy is promising for patients with bone sarcomas that are unresectable or residual after incomplete surgery. The data indicated that carbon ion radiotherapy was safe and effective for bone sarcomas, showing promising results for local control, overall survival, and lower acute and late toxicity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021258480.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsChondrosarcomaHeavy Ion RadiotherapyOsteosarcomaSarcomaHumansBone sarcomaCarbon ion radiotherapyMeta-analysisParticleSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36284346
PMCPMC9594886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.