Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284327›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Jianxiang Tang, Xiaoyu Wang, Hongli Wan, Chunying Lin, Zilun Shao, Yang Chang, Hexuan Wang, Yi Wu, Tao Zhang, Yu Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jianxiang Tang *Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu Wang *Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Hongli WanDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chunying LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Zilun ShaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yang ChangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Hexuan WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yi WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. statzhangtao@scu.edu.cn.
Yu DuHealth Emergency Management Research Center, West China-PUMC C.C. Chen Institute of Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. 456duyu@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutliers and class imbalance in medical data could affect the accuracy of machine learning models. For physicians who want to apply predictive models, how to use the data at hand to build a model and what model to choose are very thorny problems. Therefore, it is necessary to consider outliers, imbalanced data, model selection, and parameter tuning when modeling.

methodsThis study used a joint modeling strategy consisting of: outlier detection and removal, data balancing, model fitting and prediction, performance evaluation. We collected medical record data for all ICH patients with admissions in 2017-2019 from Sichuan Province. Clinical and radiological variables were used to construct models to predict mortality outcomes 90 days after discharge. We used stacking ensemble learning to combine logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) models. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC, precision, and F1 score were used to evaluate model performance. Finally, we compared all 84 combinations of the joint modeling strategy, including training set with and without cross-validated committees filter (CVCF), five resampling techniques (random under-sampling (RUS), random over-sampling (ROS), adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN), Borderline synthetic minority oversampling technique (Borderline SMOTE), synthetic minority oversampling technique and edited nearest neighbor (SMOTEENN)) and no resampling, seven models (LR, RF, ANN, SVM, KNN, Stacking, AdaBoost).

resultsAmong 4207 patients with ICH, 2909 (69.15%) survived 90 days after discharge, and 1298 (30.85%) died within 90 days after discharge. The performance of all models improved with removing outliers by CVCF except sensitivity. For data balancing processing, the performance of training set without resampling was better than that of training set with resampling in terms of accuracy, specificity, and precision. And the AUC of ROS was the best. For seven models, the average accuracy, specificity, AUC, and precision of RF were the highest. Stacking performed best in F1 score. Among all 84 combinations of joint modeling strategy, eight combinations performed best in terms of accuracy (0.816). For sensitivity, the best performance was SMOTEENN + Stacking (0.662). For specificity, the best performance was CVCF + KNN (0.987). Stacking and AdaBoost had the best performances in AUC (0.756) and F1 score (0.602), respectively. For precision, the best performance was CVCF + SVM (0.938).

conclusionThis study proposed a joint modeling strategy including outlier detection and removal, data balancing, model fitting and prediction, performance evaluation, in order to provide a reference for physicians and researchers who want to build their own models. This study illustrated the importance of outlier detection and removal for machine learning and showed that ensemble learning might be a good modeling strategy. Due to the low imbalanced ratio (IR, the ratio of majority class and minority class) in this study, we did not find any improvement in models with resampling in terms of accuracy, specificity, and precision, while ROS performed best on AUC.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningCerebral HemorrhageHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesSupport Vector MachineReactive Oxygen SpeciesEnsemble learningImbalanced dataIntracerebral hemorrhageMachine learningMortality outcome predictionOutlier detection

Identifiers

PMID36284327
PMCPMC9594939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.