Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284265›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

"Sometimes choices are not made, because we have 'a' choice, they're made because they are 'the' choice": Barriers to weight management for clients in rural general practice.

Kimberley Norman, Lisette Burrows, Lynne Chepulis, Ross Lawrenson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberley NormanUniversity of Waikato, Gate 1, Knighton Road, Hillcrest, Hamilton, New Zealand and Waikato District Health Board, Pembroke Street, Private Bag 3200, 3240, Hamilton, New Zealand. Kimberley.norman@waikato.ac.nz.
Lisette BurrowsUniversity of Waikato, Gate 1, Knighton Road, Hillcrest, Hamilton, New Zealand and Waikato District Health Board, Pembroke Street, Private Bag 3200, 3240, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Lynne ChepulisUniversity of Waikato, Gate 1, Knighton Road, Hillcrest, Hamilton, New Zealand and Waikato District Health Board, Pembroke Street, Private Bag 3200, 3240, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Ross LawrensonUniversity of Waikato, Gate 1, Knighton Road, Hillcrest, Hamilton, New Zealand and Waikato District Health Board, Pembroke Street, Private Bag 3200, 3240, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Waikato District Health Board · NZUniversity of Waikato · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is an international health issue which currently affects over 34% of New Zealand adults and leads to further physical and psychosocial health complications. People living in rural communities experience health inequities and have a high-risk of becoming obese. The aim of this study was to explore and identify barriers to effective weight management in rural Waikato general practice.

methodsUsing semi-structured interviews, 16 rural Waikato participants shared their experiences with barriers to weight management. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsFour themes were identified: resource constraints, rural locality barriers, rural sociocultural norms barriers, and participants' understanding the solutions needed to overcome their specific barriers to effective weight management. For these participants, finding a feasible weight management strategy was a challenging first step in their weight management journey. A programme that would 'work' meant one that was economically viable for low-income persons, accessible, even if living rurally with less resources, and did not cause harm or jeopardise their social connections within family or community.

conclusionOverall, participants noted a lack of weight management strategy 'choice' because of income, isolation or accessibility of their rural location and/or the sociocultural norms of the community they lived in restricted options available to them. Future weight management initiatives may be better devised from within communities themselves and will need to be cognisant of the barriers specific to rural communities. Rural perspectives have much to offer in any such reconsideration of weight management initiatives.

Indexed as

General PracticeRural PopulationAdultHumansNew ZealandObesityPrimary Health CareRural HealthObesityPatient perspectivePrimary careQualitativeRural HealthWeight Management

Identifiers

PMID36284265
PMCPMC9594876
OpenAlexW4307380507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.