Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

KUALA: a machine learning-driven framework for kinase inhibitors repositioning.

Giada De Simone, Davide Stefano Sardina, Maria Rita Gulotta, Ugo Perricone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giada De Simone *Molecular Informatics Group, Fondazione Ri.MED, Via Filippo Marini 14, 90128, Palermo, Italy. gdesimone@fondazionerimed.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-2226
Davide Stefano Sardina *Molecular Informatics Group, Fondazione Ri.MED, Via Filippo Marini 14, 90128, Palermo, Italy. dssardina@fondazionerimed.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-3016
Maria Rita GulottaMolecular Informatics Group, Fondazione Ri.MED, Via Filippo Marini 14, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5032-4888
Ugo PerriconeMolecular Informatics Group, Fondazione Ri.MED, Via Filippo Marini 14, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2181-2468
Ri.MED · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The family of protein kinases comprises more than 500 genes involved in numerous functions. Hence, their physiological dysfunction has paved the way toward drug discovery for cancer, cardiovascular, and inflammatory diseases. As a matter of fact, Kinase binding sites high similarity has a double role. On the one hand it is a critical issue for selectivity, on the other hand, according to poly-pharmacology, a synergistic controlled effect on more than one target could be of great pharmacological interest. Another important aspect of binding similarity is the possibility of exploit it for repositioning of drugs on targets of the same family. In this study, we propose our approach called Kinase drUgs mAchine Learning frAmework (KUALA) to automatically identify kinase active ligands by using specific sets of molecular descriptors and provide a multi-target priority score and a repurposing threshold to suggest the best repurposable and non-repurposable molecules. The comprehensive list of all kinase-ligand pairs and their scores can be found at https://github.com/molinfrimed/multi-kinases .

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningLigandsMachine LearningProtein KinasesLigandsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID36284125
PMCPMC9595087
OpenAlexW4307658483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.