Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36284013›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2023

Comparison of intrathecal morphine and low-dose bupivacaine with intravenous morphine for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.

Kirada Apisutimaitri, Marvin Thepsoparn, Supichaya Chairat, Ontira Ruanma, Wipusit Taesombat

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirada ApisutimaitriDepartment of Anesthesia, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Marvin ThepsoparnDepartment of Anesthesia, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand. Marvin.thep@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2302-7778
Supichaya ChairatDepartment of Anesthesia, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ontira RuanmaDepartment of Anesthesia, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wipusit TaesombatHepatobiliary-Pancreas Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Kingchulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thai Red Cross Society · THChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic liver surgery has undergone substantial advancements over the past few decades, and the key to this improvement has been an improved understanding of liver anatomy, radiologic imaging, and advancements in anesthesia and postoperative care. This study aimed to compare postoperative opioid consumption in patients receiving intrathecal morphine plus low-dose bupivacaine versus those receiving intravenous morphine.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 40 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups, of which one received 0.2 mg intrathecal morphine plus 0.25% Marcaine in a total volume of 4 mL and the other received intravenous morphine intraoperatively. Pain relief and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the visual analog scale. Intraoperative blood loss was measured at the end of the surgery while morphine consumption was measured by monitoring intravenous patient-controlled morphine at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Treatment efficacy and complications were documented.

resultsMorphine consumption was significantly different in both groups at all time points, although the pain score did not show any difference. Shoulder pain, a common adverse effect of laparoscopic surgery, was significantly lower in the intrathecal group (25% vs. 75%). Blood loss and patient satisfaction were not different between the groups. However, the intrathecal group showed a significantly higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension.

conclusionIntrathecal morphine with bupivacaine can be used effectively for managing acute post-LLR pain. THAI CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: TCTR20211015004.

Indexed as

BupivacaineLaparoscopyAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodHumansInjections, SpinalLiverMorphinePostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineMorphineAcute pain managementIntrathecal morphineLaparoscopic liver resectionLaparoscopic surgeryPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID36284013
OpenAlexW4307338028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.