ArticleWorld journal of urology2022
Association of nerve-sparing grading in robotic radical prostatectomy and trifecta outcome.
Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the neurovascular bundle preservation grades during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and compared to the trifecta combined outcome (oncologic control, continence, and sexual function) twelve months after the surgery.
methodsCohort of patients who underwent nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy had the neurovascular bundle preservation retrospectively graded from 0 to 8 according to the Hopkins subjective visual classification. Patients then were divided into two groups, according to the median of nerve-sparing grading: those with score six or high and those with score less than six. Main outcome was the trifecta combined outcome and secondary outcomes was the individual trifecta criteria (prospective analysis). A secondary analysis with groups divided according to pre-operatory SHIM score was made.
resultsOne hundred robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy were performed, of which 83 were included. There were 53 patients with grading greater than or equal to six (group 1) and 30 patients less than six (group 2). 66.6% patients (35/53) in group 1 had a trifecta combined outcome of compared to 33.3% (10/30) in group 2 (p = 0.017). Individually, the erectile function was higher in group 1 (73.6%) compared to group 2 (46.7%) (p = 0.014). Both the results of the combined endpoint trifecta and erection were also maintained in the group with preoperative SHIM ≥ 17.
conclusionsThe grading of preservation of the neurovascular bundle in radical prostatectomy is related to a better combined trifecta outcome one year after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36284002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.