Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36283832›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2024

How do New Zealand youth perceive the smoke-free generation policy? A qualitative analysis.

Janet Hoek, Ell Lee, Lani Teddy, Elizabeth Fenton, Jude Ball, Richard Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Perceptions of Children and Young People in England on the Smokefree Generation Policy: A Focus Group Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Support for smoke-free generation strategies in Italy.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janet HoekDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand janet.hoek@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-1539
Ell LeeUniversity of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lani TeddyDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Elizabeth FentonBioethics Centre, University of Otago Bioethics Centre, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1106-0589
Jude BallDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4717-5495
Richard EdwardsDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2264-9823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAotearoa New Zealand (NZ) plans to introduce a smoke-free generation (SFG) policy, alongside denicotinisation and reducing the availability of tobacco products. The SFG has a clear rationale, yet we know little about how young people, those the policy targets, perceive it. To inform policy design, communication and implementation, we explored how NZ youth perceived the SFG.

methodsWe undertook in-depth interviews with a sample of 20 youth aged 17 or 18 and explored their knowledge of the SFG, and how they perceived its individual and societal implications. We interpreted the data using a reflexive thematic analysis approach.

resultsWe identified two overarching themes. The first theme, 'societal good and protection from harm', reflected benefits participants associated with the SFG, which outweighed perceptions of lost freedoms. The second theme, 'privileging personal choice', corresponded to two small groups within the sample. The first preferred measures they considered less restrictive, such as increasing the purchase age, and some came to support the SFG as they rationalised their views. The second subgroup expressed more entrenched opposition and felt the SFG deprived them of a choice.

conclusionsYoung people's deep reflection on the SFG led most to view it as liberating rather than restrictive. Communications that avoid prompting heuristic-based responses could encourage youth to reflect on the policy and elicit strong support from the group the SFG aims to benefit.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicySmoking CessationAdolescentEmotionsHumansNew Zealanddenormalizationhuman rightspriority/special populationspublic policytobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID36283832
PMCPMC11474253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.