Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36283756›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Canadian infants presenting with Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs) and validation of clinical prediction rules for risk stratification: a protocol for a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.

Nassr Nama, Parnian Hosseini, Zerlyn Lee, Kara Picco, Jeffrey N Bone, Jessica L Foulds, Josée Anne Gagnon, Anupam Sehgal, Julie Quet, Olivier Drouin and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Nassr NamaDivision of General Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada nassr.nama@alumni.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0199-3599
Parnian Hosseini *Department of Pediatrics, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Zerlyn Lee *Department of Pediatrics, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kara Picco *Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey N BoneResearch Informatics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jessica L FouldsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Josée Anne GagnonDepartment of Pediatrics, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Anupam SehgalDepartment of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Julie QuetDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Olivier DrouinDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1429-9341
Thuy Mai LuuDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gemma VomieroDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ronik KananiDepartment of Pediatrics, North York General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joanna HollandDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ran D GoldmanThe Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) Program, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kristopher T KangDivision of General Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sanjay MahantDepartment of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0487-5835
Falla JinClinical Research Support Unit, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Joel S TiederDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Peter J GillDepartment of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Paediatric Inpatient Research Network (PIRN)
University of British Columbia · CAHospital for Sick Children · CABC Children's Hospital · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAQueen's University · CASeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBrief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs) are a common presentation among infants. While most of these events are benign and self-limited, guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics inaccurately identify many patients as higher-risk of a serious underlying aetiology (positive predictive value 5%). Recently, new clinical prediction rules have been derived to more accurately stratify patients. This data were however geographically limited to the USA, with no large studies to date assessing the BRUE population in a different healthcare setting. The study's aim is to describe the clinical management and outcomes of infants presenting to Canadian hospitals with BRUEs and to externally validate the BRUE clinical prediction rules in identified cases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre retrospective study, conducted within the Canadian Paediatric Inpatient Research Network (PIRN). Infants (<1 year) presenting with a BRUE at one of 11 Canadian paediatric centres between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 will be included. Eligible patients will be identified using diagnostic codes.The primary outcome will be the presence of a serious underlying illness. Secondary outcomes will include BRUE recurrence and length of hospital stay. We will describe the rates of hospital admissions and whether hospitalisation was associated with an earlier diagnosis or treatment. Variation across Canadian hospitals will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient. To validate the newly developed clinical prediction rule, measures of goodness of fit will be evaluated. For this validation, a sample size of 1182 is required to provide a power of 80% to detect patients with a serious underlying illness with a significance level of 5%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the UBC Children's and Women's Research Board (H21-02357). The results of this study will be disseminated as peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentations at national and international conferences.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesHospitalizationCanadaChildFemaleHumansInfantMulticenter Studies as TopicPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINENEONATOLOGYPAEDIATRICS

Identifiers

PMID36283756
PMCPMC9608523
OpenAlexW4307690458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.