Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36283732›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

Development and implementation of the maternal and child health Handbook in Angola.

Michiru Kuramata, Keiji Mochida, Sachi Fukushima, Toru Sadamori, Miho Suzuki, Ketha Rubuz Francisco, Helga Reis Freitas, Olukunmi Omobolanle Balogun, Kenji Takehara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michiru KuramataSamauma Consulting LLC, Chiba, Japan michirukuramata@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-3996
Keiji MochidaTA Networking Corp, Tokyo, Japan.
Sachi FukushimaTA Networking Corp, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru SadamoriSamauma Consulting LLC, Chiba, Japan.
Miho SuzukiTA Networking Corp, Tokyo, Japan.
Ketha Rubuz FranciscoNational Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health of Angola, Luanda, Angola.
Helga Reis FreitasNational Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health of Angola, Luanda, Angola.
Olukunmi Omobolanle BalogunDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1684-3446
Kenji TakeharaDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the maternal and child health (MCH) Handbook is widely used in many countries, its development and implementation process has not been sufficiently documented in scientific publications. This is a report of how the Angola MCH Handbook was developed, what challenges we encountered during its implementation and how they were solved. Leading the process was the MCH Handbook Committee set up to develop the MCH Handbook and implement the programme in liaison with various stakeholders. We developed the MCH Handbook through participatory workshops with the objective of producing user-responsive content and designs, foster healthy interaction and build common understanding among stakeholders. After pilot use in select health facilities, the MCH Handbook programme, which included training, monitoring and supervision, mothers' class and community awareness raising activities, was gradually implemented in three model provinces. Core members of the committee closely observed each step of the programme to identify challenges in each field, and revised the tool and programme throughout the process. As nationwide implementation of the MCH Handbook Programme progresses, it is important to continually identify challenges specific to different localities while taking measures to address them. In our experience, stakeholder involvement from the early planning and preparation stages was critical to ensure their continued commitment at later stages and for programme continuity. Our approach of tool development involving various stakeholders and flexible implementation strategies were key elements for user acceptance and programme sustainability that may be applicable for introduction of similar interventions in other settings.

Indexed as

Child HealthAngolaChildHumansProgram EvaluationMaternal healthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID36283732
PMCPMC9608535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.