ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
Simultaneous versus rapid serial interventions in a hybrid operating suite for severely injured patients: a prospective evaluation of differences in RAPTOR techniques and outcomes.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen surgical and percutaneous endovascular procedures aimed at arresting traumatic life-threatening hemorrhage are usually performed in rapid serial fashion by surgeons and interventional radiologists; truly simultaneous procedures require modifications in technique, workflow and team collaboration. The primary objective of this study was to prospectively audit outcomes in patients with ongoing hemorrhage who underwent truly simultaneous open and percutaneous procedures.
methodsWe prospectively evaluated the cases of all severely injured patients who required an open and percutaneous procedure within the hybrid RAPTOR (resuscitation with angiography, percutaneous techniques and operative repair) suite at the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, between Apr. 4, 2013, and Dec. 5, 2019. We compared outcomes between the truly simultaneous and rapid serial cases.
resultsThirty-five patients (31 [89%] male, median age 46 yr, median Injury Severity Score 30, blunt mechanism in 26 cases [74%]) underwent a hybrid intervention in the RAPTOR suite to stop ongoing hemorrhage during the study period. Twenty-three patients (66%) had a rapid serial procedure, and 12 (34%) had a truly simultaneous procedure. Demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Compared to the rapid serial group, a higher proportion of patients in the truly simultaneous group were hemodynamically unstable (11 [92%] v. 13 [56%],
conclusionTruly simultaneous open and percutaneous procedures to stop ongoing hemorrhage were unique in both patient and procedural details. For the most severely injured patients, the provision of truly simultaneous modalities is necessary to achieve clinical outcomes equivalent to those of less ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.