Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36283420›Full record

SynthesisCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Prognostic Role of DNA Damage Response Genes Mutations and their Association With the Sensitivity of Olaparib in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Dong Zhang, Xinchi Xu, Yuang Wei, Xinglin Chen, Guangyao Li, Zhongwen Lu, Xu Zhang, Xiaohan Ren, Shangqian Wang, Chao Qin

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dong ZhangThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xinchi XuThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5638-8804
Yuang WeiThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xinglin ChenThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Guangyao LiThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Zhongwen LuThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xu ZhangThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xiaohan RenThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Shangqian WangThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Chao QinThe State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, 74734The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvidence shows that gene mutation is a significant proportion of genetic factors associated with prostate cancer. The DNA damage response (DDR) is a signal cascade network that aims to maintain genomic integrity in cells. This comprehensive study was performed to determine the link between different DNA damage response gene mutations and prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Papers published up to February 1, 2022 were retrieved. The DDR gene mutations associated with prostate cancer were identified by referring to relevant research and review articles. Data of prostate cancer patients from multiple PCa cohorts were obtained from cBioPortal. The OR or HR and 95% CIs were calculated using both fixed-effects models (FEMs) and random-effects models (REMs).

resultsSeventy-four studies were included in this research, and the frequency of 13 DDR genes was examined. Through the analysis of 33 articles that focused on the risk estimates of DDR genes between normal people and PCa patients, DDR genes were found to be more common in prostate cancer patients (OR = 3.6293 95% CI [2.4992; 5.2705]). Also, patients in the mutated group had a worse OS and DFS outcome than those in the unmutated group (

conclusionThese results demonstrate that mutation in any DDR pathway results in a poor prognosis for PCa patients. Furthermore, mutations in

Indexed as

Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProstatic NeoplasmsDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansMaleMutationPhthalazinesPiperazinesPrognosisolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsDNA damage responsefrequencygene mutationsprognosisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36283420
PMCPMC9608002
OpenAlexW4307848132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.