Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36283411›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Precise movement-based predictions in the mouse auditory cortex.

Nicholas J Audette, WenXi Zhou, Alessandro La Chioma, David M Schneider

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cortical deviance detection represents a canonical difference signal.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Vocal Error Monitoring in the Primate Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas J AudetteCenter for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
WenXi ZhouCenter for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Alessandro La ChiomaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
David M SchneiderCenter for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA. Electronic address: david.schneider@nyu.edu.
New York University · US

Funding

Training Systems and Integrative NeuroscienceT32MH019524 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KIORPES, LYNNE · 1992 to 2025
$5.2M
Auditory cortical processing of self-generated soundsR01DC018802 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI David Michael Schneider · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018802NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of the sensations experienced by an organism are caused by their own actions, and accurately anticipating both the sensory features and timing of self-generated stimuli is crucial to a variety of behaviors. In the auditory cortex, neural responses to self-generated sounds exhibit frequency-specific suppression, suggesting that movement-based predictions may be implemented early in sensory processing. However, it remains unknown whether this modulation results from a behaviorally specific and temporally precise prediction, nor is it known whether corresponding expectation signals are present locally in the auditory cortex. To address these questions, we trained mice to expect the precise acoustic outcome of a forelimb movement using a closed-loop sound-generating lever. Dense neuronal recordings in the auditory cortex revealed suppression of responses to self-generated sounds that was specific to the expected acoustic features, to a precise position within the movement, and to the movement that was coupled to sound during training. Prediction-based suppression was concentrated in L2/3 and L5, where deviations from expectation also recruited a population of prediction-error neurons that was otherwise unresponsive. Recording in the absence of sound revealed abundant movement signals in deep layers that were biased toward neurons tuned to the expected sound, as well as expectation signals that were present throughout the cortex and peaked at the time of expected auditory feedback. Together, these findings identify distinct populations of auditory cortical neurons with movement, expectation, and error signals consistent with a learned internal model linking an action to its specific acoustic outcome.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionMiceMovementNeuronsSoundcortexexpectationhearinglearningmousemovementprediction

Identifiers

PMID36283411
PMCPMC9691550
OpenAlexW4307295147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.