Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36283371›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Birdsong.

Richard Mooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Model of the HVC neural network as a song motor in zebra finch.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard MooneyDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: mooney@neuro.duke.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms for internally and externally guided sensorimotor learningR01NS099288 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
Corticostriatal contributions to motor exploration and reinforcementRF1NS118424 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, TIMOTHY JAMES, LOIS, CARLOS · 2020 to 2020
$3.7M
Corticostriatal contributions to motor exploration and reinforcementR01NS118424 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, TIMOTHY JAMES, LOIS, CARLOS · 2023 to 2024
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099288NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118424NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS118424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Have your ever felt as happy as a lark, feathered your nest or taken someone under your wing? As we watch birds, we cannot help but be struck by their uncannily familiar behaviors - singing, nest building, caring for their young - to name just a few. Songbirds - the oscine suborder of perching birds that constitute roughly half (∼4,000) of all known avian species - are noted for the songs that males and sometimes both sexes in this group sing to court mates and defend territory from rivals. Birdsongs contain several to many acoustically distinct syllables, typically organized into a stereotyped phrase, and span the same audio bandwidth that we exploit for speech and music, making them easy for us to hear and appreciate. Consequently, eavesdropping humans long ago detected the most striking parallel between songbirds and humans: juvenile songbirds learn to sing in a manner similar to a child learning to speak.

Indexed as

MusicSongbirdsAnimalsFemaleHearingLearningMaleVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID36283371
PMCPMC11735021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.