Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36283144›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

Antimicrobial effect of a drinking water additive comprising four organic acids on Campylobacter load in broilers and monitoring of bacterial susceptibility.

Vanessa Szott, Elisa Peh, Anika Friese, Uwe Roesler, Corinna Kehrenberg, Madeleine Ploetz, Sophie Kittler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Targets inBiomolecules · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa SzottInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Elisa PehInstitute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, 30173 Germany. Electronic address: elisa.peh@tiho-hannover.de.
Anika FrieseInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe RoeslerInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Corinna KehrenbergInstitute for Veterinary Food Science, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Madeleine PloetzInstitute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, 30173 Germany.
Sophie KittlerInstitute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, 30173 Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Application of organic acids via feed or drinking water is under discussion as a possible intervention strategy to reduce Campylobacter (C.) load in primary poultry production. A previous in vitro study showed that reduced concentrations of sorbic acid, benzoic acid, propionic acid, and acetic acid were required for antibacterial activity against Campylobacter when using a mixture of these 4 acids compared to when using the single acids. The present study aimed at determining the antibacterial efficiency of this combination in vivo as a drinking water additive for reducing shedding and intestinal C. jejuni colonization in broilers. Furthermore, we assessed whether the inoculated C. jejuni strain BfR-CA-14430 adapted in vivo to the applied organic acids. Results of this study showed that adding the organic acids consistently reduced Campylobacter loads in cloacal swabs. While significant reductions were observed within the entire study period, a maximum 2 log reduction occurred at an age of 18 d. However, after dissection at the end of the trial, no significant differences were detected in Campylobacter loads of cecal and colon contents compared to the control group. Susceptibility testing of re-isolates from cloacal swabs and cecal content revealed equal minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values compared to the inoculated test strain, suggesting that C. jejuni remained susceptible throughout the trial.

Indexed as

CampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniDrinking WaterPoultry DiseasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrinking Wateradaptationcolonizationin vivomitigationresistance

Identifiers

PMID36283144
PMCPMC9597105
OpenAlexW4297042700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.