Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36282996›Full record

ArticleNeurons, behavior, data analysis, and theory2021

How do we generalize?

Jessica Elizabeth Taylor, Aurelio Cortese, Helen C Barron, Xiaochuan Pan, Masamichi Sakagami, Dagmar Zeithamova

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurons, behavior, data analysis, and theory, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reward Uncertainty and Expected Value Enhance Generalization of Episodic Memory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jessica Elizabeth TaylorThe Department of Decoded Neurofeedback, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.
Aurelio CorteseThe Department of Decoded Neurofeedback, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.
Helen C BarronMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Xiaochuan PanInstitute for Cognitive Neurodynamics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Masamichi SakagamiBrain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Dagmar ZeithamovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, United States.
Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International · JPEast China University of Science and Technology · CNTamagawa University · JPUniversity of Oregon · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Neural mechanisms of specificity and generalization learningR01NS112366 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ZEITHAMOVA, DAGMAR · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12024/3NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals are able to generalize or transfer information from previous experience so that they can behave appropriately in novel situations. What mechanisms-computations, representations, and neural systems-give rise to this remarkable ability? The members of this Generative Adversarial Collaboration (GAC) come from a range of academic backgrounds but are all interested in uncovering the mechanisms of generalization. We started out this GAC with the aim of arbitrating between two alternative conceptual accounts: (1) generalization stems from integration of multiple experiences into summary representations that reflect generalized knowledge, and (2) generalization is computed on-the-fly using separately stored individual memories. Across the course of this collaboration, we found that-despite using different terminology and techniques, and although some of our specific papers may provide evidence one way or the other-we in fact largely agree that both of these broad accounts (as well as several others) are likely valid. We believe that future research and theoretical synthesis across multiple lines of research is necessary to help determine the degree to which different candidate generalization mechanisms may operate simultaneously, operate on different scales, or be employed under distinct conditions. Here, as the first step, we introduce some of these candidate mechanisms and we discuss the issues currently hindering better synthesis of generalization research. Finally, we introduce some of our own research questions that have arisen over the course of this GAC, that we believe would benefit from future collaborative efforts.

Indexed as

generalizationgenerative adversarial collaboration (GAC)hippocampusLPFCmemory integrationmPFCseparate memoriestransfer

Identifiers

PMID36282996
PMCPMC7613724
OpenAlexW3140795229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.