ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2022
Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic functional screening of switchable aptamer beacon probes.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Accommodating Statistical and Physics-Based Computational Protocols for Molecular Glue Model and Evaluation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- In silico screening of naturally derived dietary compounds as potential butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Molecular mechanism of type ib MET inhibitors and their potential for CNS tumors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Screening and evaluation of novel DPP-IV inhibitory peptides in goat milk based on molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Optimal Dielectric Boundary for Binding Free Energy Estimates in the Implicit Solvent.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Exploring the material basis and molecular targets of Changma Xifeng tablet in treating Tourette syndrome: an integrative approach of network pharmacology and miRNA analysis.Metabolic brain disease · 2024Article
- Selectivity Studies and Free Energy Calculations of AKT Inhibitors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Virtual screening and molecular dynamics studies of novel small molecules targetingIn silico pharmacology · 2024Article
- Synthesis, molecular docking, and binding Gibbs free energy calculation of β-nitrostyrene derivatives: Potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease.Journal of molecular structure · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host-Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fast and accurate biomolecular free energy estimation has been a significant interest for decades, and with recent advances in computer hardware, interest in new method development in this field has even grown. Thorough configurational state sampling using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations has long been applied to the estimation of the free energy change corresponding to the receptor-ligand complexing process. However, performing large-scale simulation is still a computational burden for the high-throughput hit screening. Among molecular modeling tools, docking and scoring methods are widely used during the early stages of the drug discovery process in that they can rapidly generate discrete receptor-ligand binding modes and their individual binding affinities. Unfortunately, the lack of thorough conformational sampling in docking and scoring protocols leads to difficulty discovering global minimum binding modes on a complicated energy landscape. The Movable Type (MT) method is a novel absolute binding free energy approach which has demonstrated itself to be robust across a wide range of targets and ligands. Traditionally, the MT method is used with protein-ligand binding modes generated with rigid-receptor or flexible-receptor (induced fit) docking protocols; however, these protocols are by their nature less likely to be effective with more highly flexible targets or with those situations in which binding involves multiple step pathways. In these situations, more thorough samplings are required to better explain the free energy of binding. Therefore, to explore the prediction capability and computational efficiency of the MT method when using more thorough protein-ligand conformational sampling protocols, in the present work, we introduced a series of binding mode modeling protocols ranging from conventional docking routines to single-trajectory conventional molecular dynamics (cMD) and parallel Monte Carlo molecular dynamics (MCMD). Through validation against several structurally and mechanistically diverse protein-ligand test sets, we explore the performance of the MT method as a virtual screening tool to work with the docking protocols and as an MD simulation-based binding free energy tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.