ArticlePloS one2022
Comparison of low-salt preference trends and regional variations between patients with major non-communicable diseases and the general population.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening and monitoring patients at high risk for mental health issues in COVID-19: a multicenter pre-post assessment study.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to dietary salt among older adults in Abha, Saudi Arabia.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Trends in the incidence of peripheral vestibular disorders: a Nationwide population-based study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe compared low-salt preference between patients with major chronic diseases, also known as non-communicable diseases (hereinafter referred to as '"major NCD patients'"), and the general population.
methodsWe used data extracted from the Korea Community Health Survey Community during the period of 2008-2019. We evaluated the low-salt preference of 13 major NCD patients by year and region to analyse recent changes in low-salt preference trends, using joinpoint regression.
resultsA greater majority of major NCD patients had a higher low-salt preference than general population; however, the overall trend was not significantly significant. The low-salt preference rate (Type III) was highest among patients with diabetes (15.6%), followed by hypertension (14.1%) and dyslipidaemia (13.4%), with the general population displaying the lowest rate (11.3%). The rates of adherence to a low-salt diet and fried food without soy sauce gradually increased until 2013 and then declined. The rate of adherence to not adding salt and soy sauce at the table gradually increased and maintained a high rate of adherence until 2019, except for patients with some diseases. Regional variations in low-salt preference tended to be greater in patients with major NCDs than general population.
conclusionThere is a need to improve the low-salt diet behaviour of not only major NCD patients, but also the general population. Various low-salt diet programs need to be promoted, such as education on a low-salt diet, certification for low-salt restaurants, and sodium tax. Moreover, it is necessary to continuously monitor the low-salt preferences of major NCD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.