Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36282804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Applications of machine learning tools for ultra-sensitive detection of lipoarabinomannan with plasmonic grating biosensors in clinical samples of tuberculosis.

Yilun Huang, Charles M Darr, Keshab Gangopadhyay, Shubhra Gangopadhyay, Sangho Bok, Sounak Chakraborty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yilun HuangDepartment of Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Charles M DarrDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Center for Nano/Micro Systems & Nanotechnology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-8170
Keshab GangopadhyayDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Center for Nano/Micro Systems & Nanotechnology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Shubhra GangopadhyayDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Center for Nano/Micro Systems & Nanotechnology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Sangho BokDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Center for Nano/Micro Systems & Nanotechnology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1662-3125
Sounak ChakrabortyDepartment of Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis is one of the top ten causes of death globally and the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent. Eradicating the Tuberculosis epidemic by 2030 is one of the top United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Early diagnosis is essential to achieving this goal because it improves individual prognosis and reduces transmission rates of asymptomatic infected. We aim to support this goal by developing rapid and sensitive diagnostics using machine learning algorithms to minimize the need for expert intervention. METHODS AND

findingsA single molecule fluorescence immunosorbent assay was used to detect Tuberculosis biomarker lipoarabinomannan from a set of twenty clinical patient samples and a control set of spiked human urine. Tuberculosis status was separately confirmed by GeneXpert MTB/RIF and cell culture. Two machine learning algorithms, an automatic and a semiautomatic model, were developed and trained by the calibrated lipoarabinomannan titration assay data and then tested against the ground truth patient data. The semiautomatic model differed from the automatic model by an expert review step in the former, which calibrated the lower threshold to determine single molecules from background noise. The semiautomatic model was found to provide 88.89% clinical sensitivity, while the automatic model resulted in 77.78% clinical sensitivity.

conclusionsThe semiautomatic model outperformed the automatic model in clinical sensitivity as a result of the expert intervention applied during calibration and both models vastly outperformed manual expert counting in terms of time-to-detection and completion of analysis. Meanwhile, the clinical sensitivity of the automatic model could be improved significantly with a larger training dataset. In short, semiautomatic, and automatic Gaussian Mixture Models have a place in supporting rapid detection of Tuberculosis in resource-limited settings without sacrificing clinical sensitivity.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisBiomarkersHumansImmunosorbentsLipopolysaccharidesMachine LearningRifampinSensitivity and SpecificitySputumBiomarkersImmunosorbentslipoarabinomannanLipopolysaccharidesRifampin

Identifiers

PMID36282804
PMCPMC9595565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.