Trial reportPhysiotherapy theory and practice2024
Use of a treadmill, lift, and carry battery as a composite functional performance test: analysis of data from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in a military population participating in a functional restoration program.
Trial report in Physiotherapy theory and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of physical function and sleep with oxidative stress in adults with chronic pain: A pragmatic clinical trial secondary analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Predictors of Sustained Response to Functional Restoration in a Military Population.Military medicine · 2023Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe treadmill, lift, and carry (TLC) battery is a composite functional performance test created to measure the effectiveness of a functional restoration (FR) program in a military population. PURPOSE: To determine the validity, reliability, and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of the individual tests and the composite TLC battery.
methodsWe assessed the validity by mean differences, effect sizes, and standardized response means pre- and post-FR; and by correlations between the TLC battery and other established measures. We assessed reliability by correlating pre- and post-FR scores. We used principal component analysis (PCA) to create a composite measure. We determined MCIDs via distribution methods and receiver operator curve analysis.
resultsThere were significant (p < .001) mean changes and large effect sizes (0.6-0.8) pre- to post-FR. Pre- and posttest Spearman's correlations ranged from 0.5 to 0.6. Spearman's correlations between TLC battery scores and other measures were small (± 0.3-0.4) and significant (p < .001). PCA supported use of a single-component composite. MCIDs were treadmill time: 3 minutes; metabolic equivalent of task: 1.5 units; floor-to-waist lift: 15 lbs; waist-to-shoulder lift: 10 lbs; 40-foot carry: 10 lbs; and composite score: 6 units.
conclusionThis secondary data analysis provides preliminary support for the validity and reliability of the TLC battery for use in military populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.