ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022
An opportunity to increase human papillomavirus vaccination rates: Change the guidelines.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Human papillomavirus vaccination at age 9 or 10 years to increase coverage - a narrative review of the literature, United States 2014-2024.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Human papillomavirus vaccine administration opportunities at well visits in adolescents.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gap: Enhancing HPV (Human Papillomavirus) Education to Combat Rising Cancer Rates.Cureus · 2024Review
- Assessing the long-term implications of age 9 initiation of HPV vaccination on series completion by age 13-15 in the US: projections from an age-structured vaccination model.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Evidence supporting the initiation of HPV vaccination starting at age 9: Collection overview.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the low rates of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination initiation and timely series completion in 11- and 12-year old children, we sought to assess potential opportunities for initiating routine vaccination at a younger age. A cross-sectional study of Latino parents of HPV vaccine-eligible 9- or 10-year-old children in New York City assessed whether there were opportunities to discuss the HPV vaccine during their most recent primary care provider (PCP) visit. Parents were approached between November, 2016 and January, 2018. Of 86 parents who participated, 97% reported having visited the child's PCP in the previous year for an annual checkup and 85% reported that they had neither discussed the HPV vaccine nor received a recommendation for the vaccine during that visit. In a population of Latino parents, predominantly Mexican immigrants with less than a high school education and limited English proficiency, most 9- to 10-year-old children followed the recommendation for an annual PCP visit. Lowering the recommended age for routine vaccination with the HPV vaccine to 9 - 10 years of age should be considered as an important strategy to increase HPV vaccination rates in this and other populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.