Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36282336›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Benefits of supportive strategies for carers of people with high-grade glioma: a systematic review : Strategies for addressing the needs of high-grade glioma carers.

Diana Jones, Mark B Pinkham, Matthew P Wallen, Nicolas H Hart, Ria Joseph, Esben Strodl, Tamara Ownsworth, Vanessa Beesley, Megan Crichton, Raymond J Chan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. From diagnosis to daily realities: longitudinal phenomenological exploration of symptom trajectories in glioma survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Coordination of care in the context of primary brain tumors: Australian healthcare professionals' exploration of the unspoken impact and clinical implications.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The impact of a primary brain tumor diagnosis on caregivers: Insights from the patients' perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Diana JonesCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Mark B PinkhamPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Matthew P WallenCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Nicolas H HartCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Ria JosephCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Esben StrodlSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Tamara OwnsworthSchool of Applied Psychology & The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Vanessa BeesleyCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Megan CrichtonCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Raymond J ChanCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. raymond.chan@flinders.edu.au.
Queensland University of Technology · AUFlinders University · AUBond University · AUEdith Cowan University · AUGriffith University · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review and examine current evidence for the carer-reported benefits of supportive care strategies for carers of adults with high-grade glioma (HGG).

methodsFour databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO) were searched for articles published between January 2005 and April 2022 that assessed strategies for addressing the supportive care needs of carers of adults with HGG (WHO grade 3-4). Study selection and critical appraisal were conducted independently by three authors (DJ/MC, 2021; DJ/RJ 2022). Data extraction was conducted by one author (DJ) and checked by a second author (RJ). Results were synthesised narratively.

resultsTwenty-one studies involving 1377 caregivers were included, targeting the carer directly (n = 10), the patient-carer dyad (n = 3), or focused on people with HGG + / - their carers (n = 8). A paucity of high-quality evidence exists for effective and comprehensive support directly addressing outcomes for carers of adults with HGG. Strategies that demonstrated some benefits included those that built carer knowledge or provided emotional support, delivered by health professionals or through peer support. Supportive and early palliative care programmes have potential to reduce unmet carer needs while providing ongoing carer support.

conclusionStrategies incorporating an educational component, emotional support, and a regular needs assessment with corresponding tailored support are most valued by carers. Future practice development research should adopt a value-based approach and exceed evaluation of efficacy outcomes to incorporate evaluation of the experience of patients, carers, and staff, as well as costs.

Indexed as

CaregiversGliomaAdultHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeeds AssessmentPalliative CareBrain tumourCaregiversGliomaSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID36282336
PMCPMC9715523
OpenAlexW4307232026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.