Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36282316›Full record

ArticleBiology open2022

In vitro forestomach digestion experiments give less-biased estimates of food composition in odontocetes.

Lisa Klemens, Carolin Julie Neven, Tom Bär, Uwe Krumme, Michael Dähne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa KlemensDeutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund.
Carolin Julie NevenDeutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund.
Tom BärDeutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund.
Uwe KrummeThünen Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Alter Hafen Süd 2, 18069 Rostock.ORCID 0000-0001-5426-1079
Michael DähneDeutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund.
Deutsche Meeresmuseum · DE

Funding

Bundesamt für Naturschutz
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet composition of odontocetes is usually inferred from stomach content analyses and accounts for digestion rates derived from in vitro digestion experiments based on seal physiology. However, pinnipeds, being carnivores, have only one stomach compartment, while odontocetes, being cetartiodactyla, have up to four. Inappropriate extrapolation from digestion processes in simulated seal stomachs may result in biased estimates of odontocete diets. We simulated a forestomach accounting for muscle contractions and a pH=4 using in vitro experiments with three fish species. Whiting (Merlangius merlangus), black goby (Gobius niger) and sprat (Sprattus sprattus) showed highly variable exponential, sigmoid or linear digestion functions, and high digestion rates, taking between 50 and 230 min for completed digestion. Previous pinniped models (pH=2, lacking simulated muscular digestion) showed much slower and more similar digestion process. Our results suggest that present biomass intake estimates of odontocetes are biased towards bigger and fattier fish and need to be revised in general.

Indexed as

FishesGadiformesAnimalsDigestionFood analysesIn vitro digestionMarine mammalStomach physiology

Identifiers

PMID36282316
PMCPMC9624459
OpenAlexW4307427390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.