Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36282304›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Is the volume of Burch urethropexy sufficient for urogynecology fellows to meet the ACGME requirement?

Edward K Kim, Lily A Arya, Heidi S Harvie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward K KimDivision of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3737 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. edward.kim@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Lily A AryaDivision of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3737 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Heidi S HarvieDivision of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3737 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrogynecology fellows report low exposure to nonsling retropubic anti-incontinence procedures such as Burch urethropexy and thus may have difficulty meeting the required minimum case numbers, but there has been an even more objective exploration of this observation. Thus, our objective was to assess the feasibility of meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirement for each urogynecology fellow to perform five nonsling retropubic anti-incontinence procedures during fellowship.

methodsCross-sectional study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) databases from 2009 to 2019. From NSQIP, the number of nonsling retropubic anti-incontinence procedures (open and laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and bladder neck needle suspension) and midurethral sling procedures was extracted using CPT codes. The number of fellows was extracted from the NRMP database. Trends in the number of anti-incontinence procedures were compared with the trend in the number of fellows using linear regression.

resultsFrom 2009 to 2019 the number of fellows doubled from 81 to 176. An average of 97 nonsling retropubic anti-incontinence and 6,372 sling procedures were performed annually. Linear regression showed an increase of 10.7 fellows per year (95% CI 9.3-12.1) versus an increase of 5.8 nonsling retropubic anti-incontinence procedures per year (95% CI -0.4 to 12.1). This contrasts with an increase of 690.9 slings per year (95% CI 509.9-872.0).

conclusionsThe increase in the number of nonsling retropubic anti-incontinence procedures does not appear to match the increase in the number of urogynecology fellows. Supplementary educational approaches such as simulation may be prudent.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsUrinary BladderUrologic Surgical ProceduresBladder neck suspensionBurch urethropexyEducationFellowshipTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.