ArticleLab on a chip2022
3D printing-enabled uniform temperature distributions in microfluidic devices.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the Applications of 3D Printed Microfluidics: Utilizing Quantum Dots to Measure Internal Temperature.International journal of heat and mass transfer · 2025Article
- An open source platform to automate the design, verification, and manufacture of 3D printed microfluidic devices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 3D-printed plugs enhance cell usage efficiency for single-cell migration and neuron axon guidance assays.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Using Recurrent Neural Networks to Reconstruct Temperatures from Simulated Fluorescent Data for use in Bio-Microfluidics.International journal of thermophysics · 2023Article
- High-performance microchip electrophoresis separations of preterm birth biomarkers using 3D printed microfluidic devices.Journal of chromatography. A · 2023Article
- Rapid on-site nucleic acid testing: On-chip sample preparation, amplification, and detection, and their integration into all-in-one systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many microfluidic processes rely heavily on precise temperature control. Though internally-contained heaters have been developed using traditional fabrication methods, they are limited in their ability to isothermally heat a precisely defined volume. Advances in 3D printing have led to high resolution printers capable of using bio-compatible materials and achieving geometry resolutions near 20 μm. 3D printing's ability to create arbitrary 3D structures with an arbitrary 3D orientation as opposed to traditional microfluidic fabrication methods enables new three-dimensional heater geometries to be created. As examples, we demonstrate three new 3D heater geometries: a non-planar serpentine channel, a tapered helical channel, and a diamond channel. These new geometries are shown through finite element simulation to isothermally heat microfluidic channels of cross section 200 μm × 200 μm with a 0.1 °C temperature difference along up to 91% of a 10 mm length, compared to designs from the literature that are only able to have that same temperature distance over several μms. Finally, a set of design rules to create isothermal regions in 3D based on the desired temperature, heater pitch, heater gradient, and radial space around a target volume are detailed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.