Models Used to Predict Chemical Bioaccumulation in Fish from in Vitro Biotransformation Rates Require Accurate Estimates of Blood-Water Partitioning and Chemical Volume of Distribution.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Many human pharmaceuticals are weak inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 system in rainbow trout (Frontiers in toxicology · 2024
   Article
2. In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Hepatic Biotransformation Data for Fish. III. An In-depth Case Study with Pyrene.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2023
   Article
3. An amendedEnvironmental science. Processes & impacts · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as