Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36282016›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2023

Case Study in 21st-Century Ecotoxicology: Using In Vitro Aromatase Inhibition Data to Predict Reproductive Outcomes in Fish In Vivo.

Daniel L Villeneuve, Brett R Blackwell, Chad A Blanksma, Jenna E Cavallin, Wan-Yun Cheng, Rory B Conolly, Kendra Conrow, David J Feifarek, Larry J Heinis, Kathleen M Jensen and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel L VilleneuveGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2801-0203
Brett R BlackwellGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1296-4539
Chad A BlanksmaSpec-Pro Professional Services, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Jenna E CavallinGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7883-4740
Wan-Yun ChengIntegrated Systems Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Rory B ConollyIntegrated Systems Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Kendra ConrowSchool of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7799-5489
David J FeifarekORISE Participant, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Larry J HeinisGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Kathleen M JensenGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Michael D KahlGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Rebecca Y MilskStudent Services Contractor, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Shane T PooleORISE Participant, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Eric C RandolphStudent Services Contractor, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Travis W SaariORISE Participant, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Karen H WatanabeStudent Services Contractor, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Gerald T AnkleyGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USArizona State University · USProfessional Services Group (United States) · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reduce the use of intact animals for chemical safety testing, while ensuring protection of ecosystems and human health, there is a demand for new approach methodologies (NAMs) that provide relevant scientific information at a quality equivalent to or better than traditional approaches. The present case study examined whether bioactivity and associated potency measured in an in vitro screening assay for aromatase inhibition could be used together with an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) and mechanistically based computational models to predict previously uncharacterized in vivo effects. Model simulations were used to inform designs of 60-h and 10-21-day in vivo exposures of adult fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to three or four test concentrations of the in vitro aromatase inhibitor imazalil ranging from 0.12 to 260 µg/L water. Consistent with an AOP linking aromatase inhibition to reproductive impairment in fish, exposure to the fungicide resulted in significant reductions in ex vivo production of 17β-estradiol (E2) by ovary tissue (≥165 µg imazalil/L), plasma E2 concentrations (≥74 µg imazalil/L), vitellogenin (Vtg) messenger RNA expression (≥165 µg imazalil/L), Vtg plasma concentrations (≥74 µg imazalil/L), uptake of Vtg into oocytes (≥260 µg imazalil/L), and overall reproductive output in terms of cumulative fecundity, number of spawning events, and eggs per spawning event (≥24 µg imazalil/L). Despite many potential sources of uncertainty in potency and efficacy estimates based on model simulations, observed magnitudes of apical effects were quite consistent with model predictions, and in vivo potency was within an order of magnitude of that predicted based on in vitro relative potency. Overall, our study suggests that NAMs and AOP-based approaches can support meaningful reduction and refinement of animal testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:100-116. © 2022 SETAC. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

CyprinidaeOvaryAnimalsAromataseEcosystemEcotoxicologyEstradiolFadrozoleFemaleHumansVitellogeninsAromataseEstradiolFadrozoleVitellogeninsAdverse outcome pathwaycomputational toxicologyendocrine disruptionfungicidenew approach methodologies

Identifiers

PMID36282016
PMCPMC10782516
OpenAlexW4307233174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.