ArticleOncology reports2022
[Corrigendum] PLCε knockdown enhances the radiosensitivity of castration‑resistant prostate cancer via the AR/PARP1/DNA‑PKcs axis.
Article in Oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DNA-PKcs and PARP1 at the interface between DNA damage responses and cGAS-STING signaling: context-dependent roles and therapeutic implications.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequently to the publication of this paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that western blots featured in Figs. 4B and 5G (representing the 'AR' experiments in both cases) appeared to be the same, albeit that the bands were flipped vertically in Fig. 5G relative to Fig. 4B. The authors have re‑examined their data and realized that Fig. 5 was assembled incorrectly. The results from all the originally performed experiments were presented to the Editorial Office for our perusal. The revised version of Fig. 5, containing the correct data for the 'AR' experiment in Fig. 5G, is shown on the next page. The authors regret the inadvertent error that was made during the preparation of Fig. 5, and confirm that this error did not seriously affect the conclusions reported in the paper. The authors are grateful to the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.