Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281811›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2022

Hyperspectral Imaging for Non-invasive Diagnostics of Melanocytic Lesions.

John Paoli, Ilkka Pölönen, Mari Salmivuori, Janne Räsänen, Oscar Zaar, Sam Polesie, Sari Koskenmies, Sari Pitkänen, Meri Övermark, Kirsi Isoherranen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

John PaoliDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Guthenburg, Sweden; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ilkka PölönenFaculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. m.
Mari SalmivuoriDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Janne RäsänenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland; Department of Dermatology, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Medical technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Oscar ZaarDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Guthenburg, Sweden; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sam PolesieDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Guthenburg, Sweden; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sari KoskenmiesDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Sari PitkänenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Meri ÖvermarkDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Kirsi IsoherranenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Susanna JuteauDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland. susanna.juteau@hus.fi.
Annamari RankiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Mari GrönroosDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care Group, Lahti, Finland.
Noora NeittaanmäkiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Guthenburg, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. noora.neittaanmaki@vgregion.se.
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIRegion Västra Götaland · SEPäijät-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant melanoma poses a clinical diagnostic problem, since a large number of benign lesions are excised to find a single melanoma. This study assessed the accuracy of a novel non-invasive diagnostic technology, hyperspectral imaging, for melanoma detection. Lesions were imaged prior to excision and histopathological analysis. A deep neural network algorithm was trained twice to distinguish between histopathologically verified malignant and benign melanocytic lesions and to classify the separate subgroups. Furthermore, 2 different approaches were used: a majority vote classification and a pixel-wise classification. The study included 325 lesions from 285 patients. Of these, 74 were invasive melanoma, 88 melanoma in situ, 115 dysplastic naevi, and 48 non-dysplastic naevi. The study included a training set of 358,800 pixels and a validation set of 7,313 pixels, which was then tested with a training set of 24,375 pixels. The majority vote classification achieved high overall sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 92% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.024-0.029) in differentiating malignant from benign lesions. In the pixel-wise classification, the overall sensitivity and specificity were both 82% (95% CI 0.005-0.005). When divided into 4 subgroups, the diagnostic accuracy was lower. Hyperspectral imaging provides high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between naevi and melanoma. This novel method still needs further validation.

Indexed as

MelanomaNevus, PigmentedSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansHyperspectral ImagingSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID36281811
PMCPMC9811300
OpenAlexW4307230005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.